It is a time that we should not overlook the bullying under the situation in which the bullying is extending to various kinds of crime and even stretching to a suicide. A lot of measures related to bullying have already come up, but it is not incomplete to root out bullying fundamentally because of a disparity in schoolhood and a difficulty on applying some policies.
In the current system for dealing with bullying, each ministries, including Ministry of Education, and institutes are coming up with diverse measures against the bullying, but these cannot be the proper countermeasures to solve the bullying.
Although there are many laws and supporting policies regarding bullying in many countries, it is necessary to review comparative legal systems in U.S, Japan, Germany and Norway, which have relatively various polities toward bullying. Models - as we could see in legal regulation on the bullying, emphasis on online service providers’ responsibility in cyber-bullying and many protective programs - are stimulating to us regarding bullying.
The study suggests criminal polities against bullying as follows:
Firstly, bullying in school takes on cyber and offline violence by utilizing the Internet or smart phones. Hence, the need for system of measures against cyber-bullying. To this end, school principals should be granted the right to enforce Smart Phone Shutdown Regime and a new regulation is needed to require telecommunications network providers to filter harmful contents.
Secondly, a professional counseling teacher should be allotted to one school to identify behavior of students and give advice to them. The principal needs to be given the right to conclude a case, and his ability to conclude a case should be used as his uation index. To strengthen the role of a teacher, a master teacher system needs to be implemented. Thirdly, response procedure needs to differ depending on the severity of bullying. All cases of bullying should be reported to local education office for monitoring purposes.